Did the UN really call for the genocide of all Jews, especially those living in Israel? Not actually, but they may as well have. I have signed the petition, which will be available also for you to sign, stating that I support Israel in this issue. No people should have the right to outright murder another for the sole purpose that they are Jewish. This is against everything that is Holy, Humanitarian, and murder is just plain wrong.
John Dugard – UN Special Rapporteur
A recent UN report to the Human Rights Council (A/HRC/7/17) by UN Special Rapporteur John Dugard disregards international legal standards against terrorism and excuses the killing of innocents. We, the undersigned, urge the United Nations to reject categorically this attack on the standards of human decency at the heart of the UN’s origins.****
Terrorism is the targeted killing of innocents to intimidate a population or compel a government to act in a particular way. This definition reflects an international legal consensus, but UN Rapporteur Dugard disagrees.
UN Rapporteur Dugard claims “a distinction must be drawn between acts of mindless terror…and acts committed in the course of a war of national liberation.” He then categorizes the acts perpetrated upon Israeli civilians by Palestinians acting “against occupation” as the second kind of terror.
No terror is “mindless” in the sense of being politically unmotivated by a sense of grievance, however misconceived the grievance may be.
UN Rapporteur Dugard seeks historical support for his position: “History is replete with examples of military occupation that have been resisted by violence – acts of terror”, analogizing the Israeli occupation resisted by Palestinian terror to “the German occupation resisted by European countries in the Second World War.”
Not every act of violence is an act of terror. Comparing the murderers of Israeli civilians to the liberators of Nazi Germany (and thus the Nazis’ victims to the Nazis themselves), is a slander against the Jewish state. In fact, the European Union includes in its working definition of anti-semitism “drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to that of the Nazis.”
UN Rapporteur Dugard argues that Palestinian terror “must be understood as being a[n] inevitable consequence of occupation” and that “Until this is done [occupation is ended] violence will continue.”
Inevitability absolves Palestinian terrorists from moral responsibility for their murderous acts.
So I suppose this means that if the UN building gets blown up by al Qaida, it’s okay? Is that what he’s really saying? What if it is blown up by some people who are just sick and tired of the UN ‘occupying’ USA soil and destroying our environment? Would that be okay with him? See, his reasoning falls short when applied to himself and his life. HYPOCRITE!
It alleges they have no choice but to kill Israelis – whether blowing up men, women and children in restaurants or on buses on the way to school or at synagogue, work or play.
UN Rapporteur Dugard maintains the only proper course of action to end Palestinian terror is to meet its perpetrators’ demands.
(Not on YOUR life.)
By implication, these demands are reasonable. But Palestinian terror groups have declared that they will not end their terror campaign until Israel as a Jewish state ceases to exist. And yet according to Dugard there is no point in time at which Palestinian terror becomes “mindless.”
WHAT? So we should bend over and kiss our arses good-bye, because that is what al Qaida desires? This ‘man’ is SICK!
The words of UN Rapporteur John Dugard serve to incite terror – an egregious violation of human rights – against Jewish men, women and children living in the Jewish homeland. They therefore stand in direct contradiction to the principles and purposes of the UN Charter. We call upon the United Nations to withdraw this discreditable report from circulation as an official UN document and to reject it as a statement of UN policy.
© Eli E. Hertz
If I were not so angry about this, I would be in tears with the knowledge that the very organization that deemed Israel a country for the Jewish people is now calling for it’s destruction by omitting Israel’s Human Rights. Why do they have none? THAT IS NOT THE G-D I KNOW!
Here is the link for the petition. Please join me in telling the UN that this is unacceptable. Thank you.
“The truth may not always win, but it is always right.”
See also: Atlas Shruggs: UN SEEKS TO “REDEFINE TERROR”
OK TO TARGET JEWS.
This is definitely an open post. All I ask is that you add my post (permalink) to your site, then trackback to me. This news is absolutely outrageous, and we must spread the word. Thank you. Be sure to stop over at Linkfest, and see who else has an open trackback post. It is a very good place to join to bring up your readership and meet more friends. Have a blessed day.
As I was visiting the sites I have trackbacked to in the post right below this one, I came across David’s (third world county). He has this great post, and I couldn’t help myself. Thank you, David. ;)
Now try that on for size, UN. Ah, forget them. They’re too far gone or they’re one of them. For those who disagree with this, TOUGH. I do not wish to hear what you have to say at this time. I’m very angry right now, and I will possibly ban you from this site. Probably not, but possibly. Just leave your lies to yourself…for once.
Posts I’ve trackbacked to at Linkfest and other sites:
123beta: Islam: Stifling Free Speech World Wide, Beagle Scout: How to apologize, Beagle Scout: I’ll buy that for a dollar!, Oblogatory Anecdotes: Open Trackbacks, Open Comments 03/14-15, Phastidio.net: A Stylish Incinerator, Diary of the Mad Pigeon: Holy [PIGEONED]–a Governor Scandal eBay Auction!, Blue Star Chronicles: Sean Hannity Interviewed Senator John McCain (Video), Blue Star Chronicle: Today is the 35th Anniversary of John McCain’s Release From the Hanoi Hilton, Beagle Scout: Ars Argumentorum, Adam’s Blog: Obama’s New Politics Is the Same as the Old Politics, Beagle Scout: What is or isn’t an Argument?
Posts that have trackbacked to this post: